Quadro 7000 vs GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 400W)
GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 7000
1332
GRID A100A
+942%
13890
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
851 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
163.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
108
512
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA100
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
