Quadro 3000M vs GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
+32%
432
GRID K1
326
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
625 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GK107
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
