Quadro 3000M vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
19216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
AMD Instinct MI300X
+37724%
163400
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
19456
40
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
MI300
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
146 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
