Quadro 2000 vs Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+1763%
8945
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GP104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
