Home Comparison Quadro 2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

Quadro 2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Quadro T2000 Max Q +591%
3318

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
TU117
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net