Quadro 2000 vs Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 122W)
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+351%
2169
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
122W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
