Quadro 2000 vs GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
GRID RTX T10 4
+1983%
9999
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
TU102
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
