Quadro 2000 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1573%
8033
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GP104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
