Quadro 2000 vs GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
GRID RTX T10 16
+1983%
9999
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
TU102
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
