Quadro 2000 vs GRID K200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
GRID K200
+376%
2289
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
