Opteron 146 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 146 with 1 cores 2GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 with 8 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 90nm)
Lower TDP (55W vs 67W)
Score
General Parameters
Aug 2005
Release Date
Feb 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Venus
Core Architecture
Zen
AMD Socket 939
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Venus (E6))
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
0.114 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
67 W
Power Consumption
55 W
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
115 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
1
Total Core Count
8
1
Total Thread Count
16
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
25.0
128 KB
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
2
Max Memory Channels
2
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32
