L4 vs Quadro K200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L4 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 72W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L4
+9191%
30290
Quadro K200M
326
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
72W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK107
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
