L4 vs Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L4 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
7376 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 72W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L4
+26012%
30290
Quadro FX 880M
116
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
6
7424
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
72W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT216
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1