Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 400W)
GRID A100B 's Advantages
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
GRID A100B
+985%
13890
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2020
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
108
1024
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
32
Tensor Cores
432
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GA100
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
