Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
272 additional rendering cores
GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+708%
736
GeForce 320M
91
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
320
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
22 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
