Intel Core 3 100UL vs Apple M4 10 Core
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 3 100UL with 6 cores 1.2GHz and Apple M4 10 Core with 10 cores 4.41GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core 3 100UL 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 22W)
Apple M4 10 Core 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (7500 vs 5200)
Larger memory bandwidth (120GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.41GHz vs 1.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Score
General Parameters
Apr 2024
Release Date
May 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Raptor Lake-PS
Core Architecture
Apple M4
100U
Processor Number
-
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
Apple M-Socket
UHD Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
Apple M4 GPU (10-core)
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Generation
-
Package
-
Transistor Count
28 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
22 W
55 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
Intel
Foundry
-
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
4
4
Performance Core Threads
4
1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.41 GHz
4.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
4
Efficiency Cores
6
4
Efficiency Core Threads
6
900 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.59 GHz
3.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
6
Total Core Count
10
8
Total Thread Count
10
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
12.0
Multiplier
44
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
16 MB shared
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
Memory Types
LPDDR5X-7500
96 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
-
83.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
120 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
512
Shader Units
1280
32
Texture Units
80
16
Raster Operation Units
40
64
Execution Units
160
15 W
Power Consumption
18
1.21 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
4.6 TFLOPS
