Intel Core 3 100UL vs Intel Core 5 210H
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 3 100UL with 6 cores 1.2GHz and Intel Core 5 210H with 8 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core 3 100UL 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Intel Core 5 210H 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 5200)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 10MB)
Score
General Parameters
Apr 2024
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake-PS
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
100U
Processor Number
210H
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
BGA-1744
UHD Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU)
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Generation
Core 5(Raptor Lake-H Refresh)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
35-45 W
55 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
115 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
Intel
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
4
4
Performance Core Threads
8
1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
4
4
Efficiency Core Threads
4
900 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
6
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
22
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
Memory Types
DDR5-5200,DDR4-3200,LPDDR5-5200,LPDDR5x-5200,LPDDR4x-4267
96 GB
Max Memory Size
96 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
83.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
400 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1400 MHz
512
Shader Units
384
32
Texture Units
24
16
Raster Operation Units
12
64
Execution Units
48
15 W
Power Consumption
15
1.21 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
1.08 TFLOPS
