Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i3 14100F
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Core i3 14100F with 4 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (46W vs 58W)
Intel Core i3 14100F 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 3.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 4MB)
Score
Benchmark
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900
1284
Intel Core i3 14100F
+35%
1740
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900
2476
Intel Core i3 14100F
+253%
8756
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900
1666
Intel Core i3 14100F
+46%
2449
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900
2676
Intel Core i3 14100F
+235%
8974
Blender
Intel Celeron G6900
22
Intel Core i3 14100F
+368%
103
General Parameters
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
G6900
Processor Number
i3-14100F
LGA-1700
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated Graphics
No
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
46 W
Power Consumption
58 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
110 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
4
2
Performance Core Threads
8
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
2
Total Core Count
4
2
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34x
Multiplier
35x
80 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
128 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
128
Shader Units
-
8
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
16
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
