HD Graphics 400 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 400 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (6W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 292% (2350MHz vs 600MHz)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 400
115
Arc 140T Mobile
+4085%
4813
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-T
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
320 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
96
Shading Units
1024
12
TMUs
64
2
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
115.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
28.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
6W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Braswell GT1
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
