GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon E2400
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+12504%
6050
Radeon E2400
48
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
25W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV610
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
