GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Arc A370M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1550MHz vs 1477MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+90%
6050
Arc A370M
3174
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+13%
3904
Arc A370M
3440
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+8%
1735
Arc A370M
1599
3DMark Speed Way
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+99%
339
Arc A370M
170
Blender
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+238%
849
Arc A370M
251
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
35W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
