GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (2130MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2460
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+387%
12000
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 900
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1176 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
76.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.460 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
76.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
AD107
GTX 960 OEM
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
