GeForce GTX 760M vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 156% (1680MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1009
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+3139%
32690
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
628 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
76
768
Shading Units
9728
64
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
AD103
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
