GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
1425
Radeon Pro WX 3200
+16%
1658
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 600
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
59.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
1425 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
59.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
Polaris 23
GK106-220-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
