GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+58%
1585
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
RV770
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
