GeForce GTX 285 vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
4880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
708
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+3154%
23040
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
40
240
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD104
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
