GeForce GTX 260M vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 120W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
9616 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+10513%
32690
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
76
112
Shading Units
9728
56
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
120W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
AD103
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
