GeForce GTX 260M vs RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
2960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+2802%
8940
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
24
112
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
AD107
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
