GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon E8950
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1200MHz vs 1000MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
Radeon E8950 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2458
Radeon E8950
+66%
4096
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
E8950
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3