GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVS 5400M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVS 5400M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+871%
2458
NVS 5400M
253
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF108
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N13P-NS1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
