Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc Pro A50

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (2350MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Arc Pro A50 +8%
4813
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +41%
4694
Arc Pro A50
3328

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net