GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+268%
4416
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV770
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
