GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M385
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1515MHz vs 1000MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+73%
3103
Radeon R9 M385
1792
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+229%
3443
Radeon R9 M385
1044
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1380 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
112.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Strato
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Strato XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
