GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs GeForce 920M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
GeForce 920M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+323%
3103
GeForce 920M
733
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+956%
3443
GeForce 920M
326
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+1734%
1559
GeForce 920M
85
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1380 MHz
Base Clock
-
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
33W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK208B
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Turing
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
