GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1645MHz vs 1590MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
Radeon RX 5300
+62%
4632
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
3566
Radeon RX 5300
+2%
3653
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1327 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1408
56
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5