Home Comparison GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Arc Pro A60M

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Arc Pro A60M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.26GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
711
Arc Pro A60M +648%
5325

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1254 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.26GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.408 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
29.63 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
711.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
29.63 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
DG2-256
N14P-GT
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net