GeForce 910M vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 910M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 910M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 910M
492
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+2410%
12350
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.128 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
20.51 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
492.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
20.51 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK208B
GPU Name
AD107
N16V-GL
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
