GeForce 6200 X2 PCI vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 6 PCI
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
2
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
560.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
1.120 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV44
GPU Name
AD107
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
