GeForce 210 vs RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
RTX A400
+6838%
2706
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
RTX A400
+633%
2091
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
6
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
