GeForce 210 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
12784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+167284%
65280
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+4871%
14170
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
100
16
Shading Units
12800
8
TMUs
400
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
