GeForce 210 vs Radeon X1650 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.54GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
Board Design
31W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV530
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0