GeForce 210 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+233387%
91060
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+9107%
26240
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
142
16
Shading Units
18176
8
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
