GeForce 210 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
FireStream 9250
+2464%
1000
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV770
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
