FireStream 9250 vs Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and a Game console GPU: 16GB VRAM Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (28W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU
+453%
5530
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireStream
Generation
Console GPU
Desktop
Type
Game console
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
-
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
16
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
129.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.06 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
345.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
28W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Strix Point
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
100-000001885
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
34 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
233 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
