FireStream 9250 vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU
+729%
8294
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2023
FireStream
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
-
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
12
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Phoenix
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
