FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 335W)
Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+2265%
23650
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
80
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
335W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX
(215-121000289)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
