Home Comparison FirePro W4170M vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

FirePro W4170M vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (2010MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
691
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1687%
12350

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
AD107
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net