FirePro W4170M vs Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1219MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
691
Radeon E9172 MXM
+80%
1248
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Oct 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
8
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
