FirePro S7000 vs T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
T400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+122%
2432
T400
1094
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6