FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+353%
2432
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
536
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1280
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
